Scientology alleged to have deemed Wikipedia an enemy (or SP) organization; UPDATE BELOW


A new YouTuber, scileak0177, who claims to be a high-ranking Scientologist who has seen the light and is now helping to expose Scientology from the inside has released a set of videos which he claims are leaks from the church. The most notable set of claims pertain to Wikipedia. Firstly, it is claimed that Wikipedia is funding Anonymous. Secondly, it is claimed that the cult has declared the leader, Jimmy Wales, and other high-rankers of Wikipedia SP (Suppressive Person). Thirdly, a recommendation is made to publicly smear Wales. Lastly, a man who is supposedly a high-ranking Scientologist advises that the cult litigate Wikipedia and drag the case on in order to bankrupt them – which his something that the cult has previous experience with, having engaged in exactly this with the Cult Awareness Network. Essentially, the message is to threaten and if necessary commence a war on Wikipedia.


Scilinks0177’s most recent video suggests that he may well be a fraud – which was a strong possibility from the get-go. In this video, he claims that Xenu would never have approved of what the leaders of Scientology are doing (e.g., orchestrating and perpetuating lies, attempting to stomp out freethinking, etc.). Scientologists do not worship Xenu. The Xenu story describes Xenu as the leader of an overpopulated intergalactic confederation; Xenu was said to have attempted to relieve the overpopulation by deporting billions of alien souls to Earth, blowing them up, and then brainwashing them. These brainwashed alien souls would later latch onto humans as “body thetans” and be the source of all of our prpblems and discontents.  Xenu was never a described as a source of inspiration or someone worthy of worship. He was described as a source of problems, problems worthy of counteracting.

2 Responses to “Scientology alleged to have deemed Wikipedia an enemy (or SP) organization; UPDATE BELOW”
  1. Tuppherce says:

    Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now. Keep it up!
    And according to this article, I tottaly agree with your opinion, but only this time! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: